class: inverse background-image: url(pic/nefu-vw.svg), url(pic/xingzhenglou.png) background-size: 10%, 40% background-position: 10% 90%, 100% 50% background-color: #4f6132 <br> <br> # Metacommunity ### Xue Kui <hr style="background-color:#f7f8fa; width:40%; margin-left:0; height:2px; border:0px solid red;" /> Oct 24, 2022 --- layout: true background-image: url(pic/nefu8.svg) background-size: 60% background-position: 100% 100% --- # Community Ecology - **Community ecology**, which is primarily concerned with patterns of species distribution, abundance and interactions. <br> **A fundamental question:** .box-purple[ ### Spatial Scale. ] .footnote[ .xl[ ([Wikipedia, 2022](#bib-wikiMetacommunity)) ] ] --- # Community Ecology .l[ .sydney-blue[_**The clear limitation:**_] ] .pull-left[ .box-grey[ Focus on **local-scale** processes - Species interaction - Biodiversity - .... ]] .pull-right[ ] -- <br> >The major weakness of traditional community ecology, and why it has so conspicuously failed to come up with many patterns, rules and workable contingent theory, is its .sydney-red[**overwhelming emphasis on localness**]. >— Lawton (1999) --- class: center, middle To resolve this limitation, is there any workable concept / approach ? -- <br> A potential framework is -- #Metacommunity -- ##(集合群落) --- class: center, middle
## scale ####/skeɪl/ ## dispersal #### /dɪˈspɜːrsl/ ## heterogeneity #### /ˌhetərədʒəˈniːəti/ ## ... --- #Hierarchical framework  .pull-right[ .indent3[ .xxl[_**Scale up**_] ] #### .box-gray[Population dynamics]
<br> ### .box-yellow[Community-process]
<br> ##.box-green[Metacommunity- process] ] .footnote[ .xl[ ([Leibold and Chase, 2017](#bib-metabook)) ] ] --- #A study case - Asynchrony among local communities stabilises ecosystem function of metacommunities.  .footnote[ .xl[ ([Wilcox, Tredennick, Koerner et al., 2017](#bib-synchrony)) ] ] --- class:refpage # Reference <a name=bib-metabook></a>[Leibold, M. and J. Chase.](#cite-metabook) _Metacommunity Ecology, Volume 59_. Princeton University Press, 2017. <a name=bib-wikiMetacommunity></a>[Wikipedia.](#cite-wikiMetacommunity) _Metacommunity_. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacommunity>. 2022. <a name=bib-synchrony></a>[Wilcox, K. R., A. T. Tredennick, S. E. Koerner, et al.](#cite-synchrony) "Asynchrony among local communities stabilises ecosystem function of metacommunities". In: _Ecology Letters_ 20.12 (2017). --- class: bg-blue background-image: url(pic/nefu-vw.svg) background-position: 6% 92% background-size: 11% <br><br> #.indent2[Thanks for attention! ] <br> <div style="padding-left:3cm;"> .pull-right[ <!-- [
wsgwhym@163.com](mailto:wsgwhym@163.com) --> [
xuekui.site (_Personal Website_)](https://xuekui.site/) <!-- [
@xuekui9](https://twitter.com/xuekui9) --> [
@xuekui9](https://github.com/xuekui9) ] </div> --- 群落生态学中一个重要的问题就是尺度问题,很多研究都不可避免地包含在一个限定区域内。小尺度可能倾向于用小尺度的过程描述(比如种间竞争),大尺度用大尺度过程来描述; 而传统的群落生态学观点,比如物种互作、共生、生物多样性,存在明显的局限性,即,主要关注于局部尺度。这些过程中发现的模式、规律,可能会受到争议。controversy 那么有没有一种可行的方法应对这种局限性?一个潜在的框架:metacommunity。 它将许多关键方面联系起来,跨尺度探索生态关系。 我们可以通过meta群落的方法获得不同层次的过程和模式。从种群动态扩展到局部群落水平的过程,或者生态系统水平过程(更大尺度) 为了更好地预测生态系统对环境变化的响应,关键的一步是量化生态系统功能的稳定性。